Definition: And when David had called him, he did eat and drink before him; and he made him drunk: and at even he went out to lie on his bed with the servants of his lord, but went not down to his house.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from 2 Samuel 11:13. It's a really important and unsettling story about betrayal and injustice. Here’s what it means in simpler terms: The Basic Story: David was boasting: David, the King of Israel, was bragging to his friends about how he had tricked Bathsheba into marrying him. He drank and ate with her: He invited Bathsheba to a banquet and spent the evening drinking and eating with her. He became intoxicated: As the night went on, David became very drunk. He left her alone: He left her in the house, alone with the servants. He fell asleep and died: He fell asleep and died while still in that room. What it Means – A Bit More Detail: This verse is a direct consequence of David's betrayal. It highlights a serious problem: he was lying to Bathsheba and, through his actions, he caused her to become pregnant with her son. The Significance & Key Points: Betrayal & Deceit: It’s a story about someone deceiving another person – in this case, Bathsheba. Justice Delayed: The verse indicates that David's actions were causing problems and delaying the natural order of things. It shows that even though he had a right to enjoy himself, his behavior was disruptive and upsetting. God’s Perspective: The story is presented as God observing this situation. He's not just narrating it; he's saying that David's actions were wrong and that God is displeased with him. It's a Warning: This verse serves as a strong warning to the reader – it reminds us that even when we feel like we’re in control, our actions can have consequences, and we must be careful about what we do. It also shows the potential for serious consequences from betrayal and deception. Do you want me to: Explain any of these points further? Give you a summary of the context of 2 Samuel 11? Talk about how this story is often interpreted in different ways (like its implications for morality)?